Products
nanamica — Polyester Wool Field Shirt

nanamica

Polyester Wool Field Shirt

ShirtsSKU: S26SG058U
C

58/100

Well-made, but rough on the environment.

Buy once, keep for years to amortize the production hit.

Material C · 58Health D · 49Eco · 35Label · highFit · relaxed

Why this material grade?

This product scored 58/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 70% Polyester, 30% Wool. Blended from 70% Polyester, 30% Wool — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.

Average quality, high synthetic content

Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.

Breakdown

Composition

70% Polyester, 30% Wool

Mixed blend — natural + synthetic

🔬

Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🐑

Wool is naturally antibacterial and self-cleaning. You can air it out between wears instead of washing — it'll stay fresh.

Network

Performance

spec sheet
Construction
Poplin

Tight plain weave — dress shirts

Fit
Relaxed

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$2.38/wear · 130 expected wears

Investment piece — wear it

How we got there

Base for Shirts: 100 expected wears.

× 1.30 for Polyester (high-durability fiber, durability 81).

= 130 expected wears. $310 ÷ 130$2.38/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

flat dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

recommended

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

👔Formal/Office
Good

Good durability (81) and comfort (51) for office wear

🌧️Rain/Weather
Good

Good moisture wicking (61) and durability (81) for weather protection

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

D49/100

High health impact — significant synthetic content or likely chemical treatments. For frequent skin-contact wear, consider a natural-fiber alternative.

MicroplasticsHIGH

700,000 fibers/wash

Skin contactHIGH

70% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

Antimony

  • Antimony (trace): Virgin polyester contains trace antimony from PET production. Recycled polyester reduces but does not eliminate it.
🌿 Find plastic-free alternatives →How we score health impact →Not medical advice — based on material composition.

Eco Rating

35/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action