Products
Aztec Mountain — ORTOVOX MERINO TECH TEE

Aztec Mountain

ORTOVOX MERINO TECH TEE

ShirtsSKU: 88163
B

82/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material B · 82Health A · 95Eco · 67Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 82/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 85% Merino Wool, 15% Polyamide. Blended from 85% Merino Wool, 15% Nylon — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.

Good quality

Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. The natural-synthetic blend offers durability with comfort. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.

Breakdown

Composition

85% Merino Wool, 15% Polyamide

Mixed blend — natural + synthetic

⚠️

Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🐑

Wool is naturally antibacterial and self-cleaning. You can air it out between wears instead of washing — it'll stay fresh.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
67¢/wear · 100 expected wears

Reasonable cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Shirts: 100 expected wears.

× 1.00 for Merino Wool (mid-durability fiber, durability 75).

= 100 expected wears. $67 ÷ 10067¢/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

flat dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

recommended

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

🧥Winter Outerwear
Excellent

Excellent warmth (82) and durability (75) for cold weather

👔Formal/Office
Excellent

Excellent durability (75) and comfort (82) for office wear

🌧️Rain/Weather
Excellent

Excellent moisture wicking (84) and durability (75) for wet conditions

🏃Athletic Wear
Good

Good breathability (78) and moisture wicking (84) for light activity

👕Everyday Casual
Good

Good comfort (82) and care ease (55) for casual wear

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (82) and breathability (78) for sleeping

🩲Underwear
Good

Good breathability (78) and comfort (82) for undergarments

⛰️Outdoor/Hiking
Good

Good durability (75) and breathability (78) for outdoor activities

🌱Sustainable Fashion
Good

Good sustainability score (67)

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A95/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactLOW

15% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

67/100

Moderate impact — consider eco alternatives

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action