Products
Jöttnar — Mjolnir Fleece-lined Merino Technical Beanie

Jöttnar

Mjolnir Fleece-lined Merino Technical Beanie

SweatersSKU: A25MAC1137OSBL
C

63/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material C · 63Health B · 74Eco · 45Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 63/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 50% Merino Wool, 50% Acrylic. Blended from 50% Merino Wool, 50% Acrylic — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.

Average quality, high synthetic content

Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.

Breakdown

Composition

50% Merino Wool, 50% Acrylic

Mixed blend — natural + synthetic

🚨

Acrylic sheds more microfibers than any other fabric — up to 730,000 per wash. It's the worst offender for microplastic pollution.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🐑

Wool is naturally antibacterial and self-cleaning. You can air it out between wears instead of washing — it'll stay fresh.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
64¢/wear · 70 expected wears

Reasonable cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Sweaters: 100 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Merino Wool (low-durability fiber, durability 59).

= 70 expected wears. $45 ÷ 7064¢/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

flat dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

recommended

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

🧥Winter Outerwear
Good

Good warmth (80) for cold weather

👕Everyday Casual
Good

Good comfort (64) and care ease (65) for casual wear

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

B74/100

Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.

MicroplasticsMEDIUM

730,000 fibers/wash

Skin contactMODERATE

50% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

🌿 Find plastic-free alternatives →How we score health impact →Not medical advice — based on material composition.

Eco Rating

45/100

Moderate impact — consider eco alternatives

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action