Montura — GRAPHIC LOGO SOCKS

Montura

GRAPHIC LOGO SOCKS

SocksSKU: MKMY06X_JS005_241_XS-S
C

56/100

Well-made, but plastic on skin.

Not recommended for socks — synthetic on skin, all day, all night.

Material C · 56Health D · 40Eco · 18Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 56/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 80% Polypropylene, 18% Polyamide, 2% Elastane. Blended from 80% Polypropylene, 18% Nylon, 2% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.

Average quality, high synthetic content

Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.

Breakdown

Composition

80% Polypropylene, 18% Polyamide, 2% Elastane

Plastic-based — sheds microplastics in wash

Fabric details
eVent™
Likely chemical finishes
Antimicrobial biocide · biocide
Stated on the product page — not lab-tested. Not medical advice.
Care (from the label)
Do not tumble dryDo not ironDo not bleachDo not dry clean
⚠️

Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🧺

Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
32¢/wear · 50 expected wears

Strong cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Socks: 50 expected wears.

× 1.00 for Polypropylene (mid-durability fiber, durability 69).

= 50 expected wears. $16 ÷ 5032¢/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

Do not iron

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: regularSoftener: No

Best For

👔Formal/Office
Good

Good durability (69) and comfort (50) for office wear

🌧️Rain/Weather
Good

Good moisture wicking (78) and durability (69) for weather protection

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

D40/100

High health impact — significant synthetic content or likely chemical treatments. For frequent skin-contact wear, consider a natural-fiber alternative.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactHIGH

100% synthetic

ChemicalsHIGH

Biocide

  • Biocide (likely): "Antimicrobial biocide" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
🌿 Find plastic-free alternatives →How we score health impact →Not medical advice — based on material composition.

Eco Rating

18/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring