FabricIQ
Reading the label…
B
71/100
01Verdict
Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.
Best for Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.
Material B · 71Health A · 100Eco · 69Label · high170 gsm
Why this material grade?
This product scored 71/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 55% Linen, 45% Cotton. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 55% Linen, 45% Cotton — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality
Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.
02Breakdown
Composition
55% Linen, 45% Cotton
All-natural fiber
Fabric details
170 g/m²
Added Jun 10, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 10, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
🌱
Cotton biodegrades in 1-5 months. When you're done with this, it returns to the earth — not the ocean.
💧
Cotton absorbs moisture but doesn't wick it. Great for a hot day, terrible for hiking — you'll stay wet.
🏛️
Linen is made from flax, which grows in poor soil with little water. It's been used for clothing for over 30,000 years.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Fabric weight
- 170 g/m²
Mid-weight
Cost per wear
estimated$2.88/wear · 85 expected wears
Investment piece — wear it
How we got there
Base for this category: 100 expected wears.
× 0.85 for 170 g/m² (mid-weight).
× 1.00 for Linen (mid-durability fiber, durability 71).
= 85 expected wears. $245 ÷ 85 ≈ $2.88/wear.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Oxygen only
Dry
line dry
Best For
👔Formal/Office
ExcellentExcellent durability (71) and comfort (76) for office wear
🏃Athletic Wear
GoodGood breathability (91) and moisture wicking (54) for light activity
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (76) and care ease (61) for casual wear
😴Sleepwear
GoodGood comfort (76) and breathability (91) for sleeping
🩲Underwear
GoodGood breathability (91) and comfort (76) for undergarments
⛰️Outdoor/Hiking
GoodGood durability (71) and breathability (91) for outdoor activities
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
A100/100
Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.
Microplastics LOW
Minimal
Skin contact LOW
0% synthetic
Chemicals LOW
No flags
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action