FabricIQ
Reading the label…
01Verdict
Well-made, but rough on the environment.
Best for Buy once, keep for years to amortize the production hit.
Material C · 58Health C · 58Eco · 37Label · high230 gsm
Why this material grade?
This product scored 58/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 60% Cotton, 23% Polyester, 17% Acrylic. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 60% Cotton, 23% Polyester, 17% Acrylic — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.
Average quality, high synthetic content
Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.
Budget pick
$79Below-typical fabric quality, but cheaper than the category median.
$1.36 per quality point Category median: $95 · grade C
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other shirts. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
02Breakdown
Composition
60% Cotton, 23% Polyester, 17% Acrylic
Mixed blend — natural + synthetic
Fabric details
eVent™✓ RWS
Flannel construction · 230 g/m²
Added Jun 10, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 10, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
🔬
Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
⚖️
Cotton (score 65) is carrying this blend. Acrylic (score 40) is pulling it down.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Fabric weight
- 230 g/m²
- Construction
- Flannel
Heavyweight
Brushed weave — soft, warm
Cost per wear
estimated94¢/wear · 84 expected wears
Reasonable cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for Shirts: 100 expected wears.
× 1.20 for 230 g/m² (heavyweight).
× 0.70 for Cotton (low-durability fiber, durability 63).
= 84 expected wears. $79 ÷ 84 ≈ 94¢/wear.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
warm (40°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
flat dry
Iron
Best For
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (65) and care ease (79) for casual wear
👔Formal/Office
GoodGood durability (63) and comfort (65) for office wear
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated shirts products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
C58/100
Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.
Microplastics MEDIUM
700,000 fibers/wash
Skin contact MODERATE
40% synthetic
Chemicals MODERATE
Formaldehyde
- Formaldehyde (possible): Cotton-dominant dress shirts are commonly treated with formaldehyde resin for wrinkle resistance ("non-iron" / "wrinkle-free").
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
