All brands
M

Mammut

35 products analyzed

Well-made, but rough on the environment.

โ†ณ Buy once, keep for years to amortize the production hit.

Material grade

C

55/100

Typical, OK

7-axis fabric score average

Health Impact grade

F

35/100

Poor material

microplastic + skin contact + chemicals

Breakdown

CategoryProductsAvg scoreGradeHealthPlastic-freePrice rangeTop pick
Pants1955CD43โ€”โ€”Eiger Nordwand Advanced HS Pants Men
Jackets & Outerwear1656CF25โ€”โ€”Crater IV HS Hooded Jacket Women
Click a category to see Mammut vs other brands in that category. Click a top pick to see the full product breakdown.

High microplastic

100%

Half the catalog flagged

Antimony

51%

Half the catalog flagged

PFAS likely

46%

Common in this catalog

Formaldehyde

0%

Not flagged in our data

Plastic-free

0%

Almost none plastic-free

Label Confidence

35 products

77% high6% moderate17% low

Heuristic flags for vague language, undisclosed linings, organic/recycled claims without certification. How fabric labels can mislead โ†’

Data Coverage

Fresh ยท last scrape 0d ago

Composition100%
Price0%
Image0%
Fabric weight (gsm)0%
Country of manufacture0%
Fit type0%

What % of Mammut's 35 catalog products have each field. Empty bars mean we don't have the data, not that the brand hid it โ€” these are gaps we're working to fill.

Network

Tradeoffs

What this score doesn't measure

Construction, fabric weight, finishing chemicals.Same composition can land in two very different garments. We rate the materials a brand uses; we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

Action