Cinq a Sept — Mini Ikat Roses Stevie Dress

Cinq a Sept

Mini Ikat Roses Stevie Dress

DressesSKU: ZD302812252Z-GRDMT-00
C

57/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material C · 57Health A · 100Eco · 37Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 57/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 53% Rayon, 53% Rayon. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 53% Rayon, 53% Rayon — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.

Everyday quality

This fabric does the job for daily wear. Not premium, not bad — it's the middle of the road. Follow care instructions carefully to extend its life.

Breakdown

Composition

53% Rayon, 53% Rayon

Fabric details
eVent™
Denim construction
Care (from the label)
Dry clean only

Added Jun 4, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 4, 2026

Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.

🏭

The fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon emissions — more than aviation and shipping combined.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$12.14/wear · 35 expected wears

Premium price — wear-it-often math

How we got there

Base for Dresses: 50 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Rayon (low-durability fiber, durability 37).

= 35 expected wears. $425 ÷ 35$12.14/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (83) and breathability (76) for sleeping

🩲Underwear
Good

Good breathability (76) and comfort (83) for undergarments

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A100/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Minimal

Skin contactLOW

0% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

37/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Biodegradable

Materials will naturally decompose.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring