Eddie Bauer — Girls Graphic Ultrasoft Hoodie
Eddie Bauer

Girls Graphic Ultrasoft Hoodie

SweatersSKU: 832LK992-NVL-OTG-XXS
D

54/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material D · 54Health B · 80Eco · 32Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 54/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 78% Rayon, 18% Polyester, 4% Spandex. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 78% Rayon, 18% Polyester, 4% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

D (40-54): Below-average material composition — weak on durability or comfort.

Below average — consider alternatives

This fabric scores low on quality. It may pill, wear out quickly, or not feel great against skin. And when it does wear out, it'll sit in a landfill for decades. Look for higher-rated options.

Budget pick

$16

Below-typical fabric quality, but cheaper than the category median.

$0.30 per quality pointCategory median: $125 · grade C

Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other sweaters. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.

Breakdown

Composition

78% Rayon, 18% Polyester, 4% Spandex

Plastic-based — sheds microplastics in wash

Fabric details
Fleece construction
Care (from the label)
Machine wash coldIron OK

Added Jun 4, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 4, 2026

Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.

🔬

Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🧺

Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
23¢/wear · 70 expected wears

Strong cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Sweaters: 100 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Rayon (low-durability fiber, durability 45).

= 70 expected wears. $16 ÷ 7023¢/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (72) and breathability (63) for sleeping

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

B80/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsMEDIUM

700,000 fibers/wash

Skin contactLOW

22% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

32/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring