71/100
Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.
↳ Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.
Why this material grade?
This product scored 71/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 70% Wool, 26% Cashmere, 1% Elastane. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 70% Wool, 26% Cashmere, 1% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality
Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. The natural-synthetic blend offers durability with comfort. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.
Premium fabric, premium price
$90Better-than-typical fabric, but priced above the category median.
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other accessories. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
Breakdown
Composition
70% Wool, 26% Cashmere, 1% Elastane
Mostly natural with stretch
Added Jun 4, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 4, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.
Wool is naturally antibacterial and self-cleaning. You can air it out between wears instead of washing — it'll stay fresh.
Network
Cost per wear
rough estimateReasonable cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for Accessories: 200 expected wears.
× 0.70 for Wool (low-durability fiber, durability 60).
= 140 expected wears. $90 ÷ 140 ≈ 64¢/wear.
Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
flat dry
Iron
low
Dry Clean
recommended
Best For
Good breathability (72) and moisture wicking (69) for light activity
Good warmth (87) for cold weather
Good durability (60) and comfort (72) for office wear
Good comfort (72) and breathability (72) for sleeping
Good breathability (72) and comfort (72) for undergarments
Good moisture wicking (69) and durability (60) for weather protection
Good sustainability score (61)
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated accessories products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
Outdoor Research
Fairbanks Fingerless Gloves
100% Merino Wool
Icebreaker
Unisex Merino 200 Pocket Hat
100% Merino Wool
Icebreaker
Unisex Merino 200 Pocket Hat
100% Merino Wool
Icebreaker
Unisex Merino 200 Oasis Reversible Beanie
100% Merino Wool
Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.
Very low
1% synthetic
No flags
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
Action