FabricIQ
Reading the label…
B
82/100
01Verdict
Well-made, but plastic on skin.
Best for Outerwear or layers — not for direct skin contact.
Material B · 82Health C · 65Eco · 67Label · high245 gsm
Why this material grade?
This product scored 82/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 85% Merino Wool, 13% Nylon, 2% Spandex. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 85% Merino Wool, 13% Nylon, 2% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality
Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. The natural-synthetic blend offers durability with comfort. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.
02Breakdown
Composition
85% Merino Wool, 13% Nylon, 2% Spandex
Mostly natural with stretch
Fabric details
✓ OEKO-TEX®✓ RWS✓ STANDARD 100
Interlock construction · 245 g/m²
Likely chemical finishes
⚠ Easy-care resin · formaldehyde
Stated on the product page — not lab-tested. Not medical advice.
Care (from the label)
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
⚠️
Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
🧺
Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Fabric weight
- 245 g/m²
- Construction
- Interlock
Heavyweight
Cost per wear
estimated62¢/wear · 120 expected wears
Reasonable cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for this category: 100 expected wears.
× 1.20 for 245 g/m² (heavyweight).
× 1.00 for Merino Wool (mid-durability fiber, durability 74).
= 120 expected wears. $75 ÷ 120 ≈ 62¢/wear.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
flat dry
Iron
Best For
🧥Winter Outerwear
ExcellentExcellent warmth (82) and durability (74) for cold weather
👔Formal/Office
ExcellentExcellent durability (74) and comfort (83) for office wear
🏃Athletic Wear
GoodGood breathability (77) and moisture wicking (84) for light activity
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (83) and care ease (55) for casual wear
😴Sleepwear
GoodGood comfort (83) and breathability (77) for sleeping
🩲Underwear
GoodGood breathability (77) and comfort (83) for undergarments
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
C65/100
Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.
MicroplasticsLOW
Very low
Skin contactLOW
15% synthetic
ChemicalsHIGH
Formaldehyde
- Formaldehyde (likely): "Easy-care resin" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action