Cuyana — Poplin Cropped Overlay Shirt
Cuyana

Poplin Cropped Overlay Shirt

ShirtsSKU: 20042647-100-00L

Low planet cost, but plastic on skin.

Low planet cost, but synthetic — wear over a base layer.

Material B · 73Health C · 69Eco · 79Label · moderate

Why this material grade?

This product scored 73/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 96% Organic Cotton, 4% Elastane. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 96% Organic Cotton, 4% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.

Good quality, eco-friendly

Solid fabric with strong environmental credentials. Organic Cotton (96%) is doing the heavy lifting. This is a smart buy.

Premium fabric, premium price

$148

Better-than-typical fabric, but priced above the category median.

$2.03 per quality pointCategory median: $100 · grade C

Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other shirts. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.

Breakdown

Composition

96% Organic Cotton, 4% Elastane

Mostly natural with stretch

Fabric details
eVent™OEKO-TEX®
Poplin construction
Likely chemical finishes
Easy-care resin · formaldehyde
Stated on the product page — not lab-tested. Not medical advice.
Care (from the label)
Machine wash coldDry flatIron lowDo not bleach

Added Jun 4, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 4, 2026

Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🧺

Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$2.11/wear · 70 expected wears

Investment piece — wear it

How we got there

Base for Shirts: 100 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Organic Cotton (low-durability fiber, durability 60).

= 70 expected wears. $148 ÷ 70$2.11/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: regularSoftener: No

Best For

👕Everyday Casual
Excellent

Excellent comfort (80) and easy care (75) for daily wear

👔Formal/Office
Good

Good durability (60) and comfort (80) for office wear

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (80) and breathability (83) for sleeping

🩲Underwear
Good

Good breathability (83) and comfort (80) for undergarments

🌱Sustainable Fashion
Good

Good sustainability score (79)

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

C69/100

Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactLOW

4% synthetic

ChemicalsHIGH

Formaldehyde

  • Formaldehyde (likely): "Easy-care resin" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
🌿 Find plastic-free alternatives →How we score health impact →Not medical advice — based on material composition.

Eco Rating

79/100

Strong environmental credentials

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

Label Confidence

MODERATE

Label confidence moderate — one signal suggests the composition may be incomplete or under-verified.

  • Organic cotton claim without explicit certification (GOTS, OCS). Check brand's certification disclosures separately.
How fabric labels can mislead — and what to look for →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring