FabricIQ
Reading the label…
01Verdict
Well-made, but plastic on skin.
Best for Outerwear or layers — not for direct skin contact.
Material C · 69Health D · 47Eco · 58Label · moderate70 gsm
Why this material grade?
This product scored 69/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 50% Alpaca, 35% Recycled Polyester, 15% Polyester. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 50% Alpaca, 35% Recycled Polyester, 15% Polyester — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.
Average quality, high synthetic content
Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.
Great fabric value
$199Better-than-typical fabric for this category, at a below-median price.
$2.88 per quality pointCategory median: $225 · grade C
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other jackets. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
02Breakdown
Composition
50% Alpaca, 35% Recycled Polyester, 15% Polyester
Blend — recycled synthetic + natural
Fabric details
eVent™✓ Certified B Corp✓ bluesign®DWR
70 g/m²
Likely chemical finishes
⚠ Antimicrobial biocide · biocide⚠ Durable water repellent · PFAS
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
🔬
Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
⚖️
Alpaca (score 79) is carrying this blend. Polyester (score 52) is pulling it down.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Fabric weight
- 70 g/m²
Lightweight
Cost per wear
estimated$1.66/wear · 120 expected wears
Reasonable cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for Jackets: 200 expected wears.
× 0.60 for 70 g/m² (lightweight).
× 1.00 for Alpaca (mid-durability fiber, durability 77).
= 120 expected wears. $199 ÷ 120 ≈ $1.66/wear.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
flat dry
Iron
Best For
👔Formal/Office
ExcellentExcellent durability (77) and comfort (65) for office wear
🧥Winter Outerwear
GoodGood warmth (68) for cold weather
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (65) and care ease (65) for casual wear
⛰️Outdoor/Hiking
GoodGood durability (77) and breathability (53) for outdoor activities
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated jackets products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
D47/100
High health impact — significant synthetic content or likely chemical treatments. For frequent skin-contact wear, consider a natural-fiber alternative.
MicroplasticsMEDIUM
600,000 fibers/wash
Skin contactMODERATE
50% synthetic
ChemicalsHIGH
PFAS, Antimony, Biocide
- PFAS (likely): "Durable water repellent" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
- Antimony (trace): Virgin polyester contains trace antimony from PET production. Recycled polyester reduces but does not eliminate it.
- Biocide (likely): "Antimicrobial biocide" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
Label Confidence
MODERATELabel confidence moderate — one signal suggests the composition may be incomplete or under-verified.
- ⚠Recycled-fiber claim without explicit certification (GRS, RCS). Chain-of-custody for recycled materials is hard to verify without one.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
